Legal Opinion

State v. Cardus

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1997No. 19260PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACOBA, Judge.

We hold that the “consent” of an imprisoned person who, under the terms of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-731(l)(c) (1993) is subjected to sexual penetration by a person employed in a state correctional facility, is “ineffective consent” as defined in HRS § 702-235(3) (1993), and therefore not a defense to that charge of sexual assault in the second degree defined in HRS § 707-731(l)(c). We find support for our holding in the analogous section of the Model Penal Code and'Commentaries (Official Draft and Revised Comments 1980) (MPC) and in construing HRS § 707-731(l)(c) in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LoaHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. McGriffHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BuchHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. IuliHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. Schnabel.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Estate of Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. NupeisetHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API