Legal Opinion · Dissent

Borello v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1979No. Appeals, Nos. 2171, 2185 and 2186 C.D. 1977Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Craig :

I must respectfully dissent because the facts and the findings in the record, establishing a lockout of all three of the petitioning groups of employees, lead to *365the conclusion that the employees are not rendered ineligible for compensation under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, (Law), 43 P.S. §802(d).

There can be no dispute concerning the abstract validity of the judicial doctrine which governs when Section 402(d) of the Law is applicable by reason of a work stoppage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Hershey Estates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API