Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Oatman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1829PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

George Oatman, the husband of the defen*224dant in error, was seized in his life-time of 67 acres and a-half of land, in Floyd county. On the 18th of March, 1816, Wilson, the plaintiff in error, purchased this land from Oatman, received a bond conditioned for a title to be made on payment of the purchase-money, and was put into possession of the premises. The payment of the purchase-money was completed in March, 1819. Oatman died in 1821, without having executed a deed to Wilson. In 1824, Wilson applied to the Probate Court, and obtained the legal title for the land, according to his bond. At the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powell v. Monson & Brimfield Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1824
  2. Hale v. JamesNew York Court of Chancery · 1822

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Summers v. BabbIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Smallman v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gridley v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Throp v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Baden v. McKennyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API