Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 2010No. 5D08-4214PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this Anders appeal, 1 appellate counsel advised this Court that in good faith, he could not argue that reversible error occurred in the trial court. Pursuant to the constitutional mandate of Anders, and the instruction of the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987), we undertook an independent review of the record. Although we affirm the convictions and sentences, our review revealed a sentencing error that was not preserved by objection at sentencing or by motion to correct sentence. As a result, the issue is not preserved for appellate review and we are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. CauseySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Conley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Auriemma v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. C.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API