Legal Opinion
Burkhart v. Medserv Corp.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided March 1, 1996No. Civil 95-5230PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.
This matter is currently before the court on the motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for more definite statement, filed by Medserv d/b/a Primedica Hospital Services Division. Medserv contends this action should be dismissed for the following reasons: (1) the court lacks personal jurisdiction over it; (2) venue is improper; and (3) the complaint fails to state a claim for relief against it. Alternatively, Medserv asks that the plaintiff be directed to file a more definite statement on the basis that the complaint is so vague and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murray v. Solidarity of Labor Organization International Union Benefit FundDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund v. Elite Erectors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
- Warfield v. KR Entertainment, Inc. (In Re Federal Fountain, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund v. GendronDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. BINT Operations LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022