Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Terrebonne Parish School Board
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided November 2, 2004No. Civ.A. 03-2500PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs Dale Flynn and Dale Flynn, Jr.’s motion for a new trial. By Order and Reasons dated September 8, 2004, the Court granted defendant Terrebonne Parish School Board’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion.
Because there was no trial, plaintiffs’ motion for a “new trial” following summary judgment is inappropriate. The Court will, however, construe the motion as a motion to “alter or amend the judgment” pursuant to Rule 59(e). See Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc., 77 F.3d 782,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edward H. Bohlin Co., Inc. v. Banning Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Herman Fields v. Pool Offshore, Inc., Pool Company, Incorrectly Sued as Pool Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Nevares v. San Marcos Consolidated Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- Action Ink, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Bradford v. Ochsner Clinic FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Celino v. Biotronik IncDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Justice v. Jefferson ParishDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Mountaineer Minerals, LLC v. Antero Resources CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.