Action Ink, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Anheuser-Busch’s motion for summary judgment on its counterclaim and plaintiffs claims. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims and on defendant’s counterclaim. The Court DENIES defendant’s request for attorneys’ fees.
I. BACKGROUND
This trademark infringement and unfair competition case arises out of a dispute between plaintiff Action Ink, Inc., a sports *939marketing firm, and defendant AnheuserBusch, Inc. In 1984, plaintiff filed an application to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Casa Tradicion S.A. de C.V. v. Casa Azul Spirits, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
- Delta Fuel Company, LLC v. Delta Utilities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025