Legal Opinion

St. Joseph Township v. City of St. Joseph

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. Calendar 61, Docket 50,102PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Plaintiffs began the present proceeding to challenge the validity of an annexation election 1 which resulted in the detachment of certain properties from plaintiff township and their annexation to defendant city. Plaintiffs first petitioned the circuit court for leave to file an information in the nature of quo warranto, pursuant to CL 1948, §§ 638.28-638.30 (Stat Ann §§ 27.2342-27.2344), 2 alleging in tlieir petition material fraud in the election and tlie prosecuting1 attorney’s refusal to institute quo warranto proceedings. After grant of leave plaintiffs filed an information alleging that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Seavitt v. McQuadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Harwood v. StillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People ex rel. White v. DoesburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. St. Joseph Township v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Marian v. BeardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hanlin v. Saugatuck TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Smith v. Scio TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Davis v. ChatmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Barrow v. Detroit MayorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Houston v. McKinlayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API