Legal Opinion

Benick v. Nanogate North America LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 27, 2023No. 1:22-cv-01479Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BRIAN BENICK, Case No. 1:22-CV-01479-PAB Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER NANOGATE NORTH AMERICA, LLC, ORDER Defendant. Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Nanogate North America, LLC’s Motion to Renews its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and 41. (Doc. No. 21.) Plaintiff Brian Benick did not file any opposition or otherwise respond to Nanogate’s renewed Motion. Accordingly, Nanogate’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Background On May 8, 2023, Nanogate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tung-Hsiung Wu (Sean Tung-Xiung Wu) v. T.W. Wang, Inc. D/B/A World Journal USACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Schafer v. City of Defiance Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Sam L. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. John Carpenter v. City of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API