City of New York v. Torres
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1ConcurrenceKristin Booth Glen, J.
While I join in the result set forth in the Per Curiam opinion, I would find as a matter of law that Housing Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this summary proceeding because petitioner City of New York (the City) has failed to state a cause of action.
As a governmental entity, the City may not terminate the tenancies of tenants in in rem buildings without cause (512 E. 11th St. HDFC v Grimmet, 181 AD2d 488 [1st Dept 1992]; 157 W. 123rd St. Tenants’ Assn. v Hickson, 142 Misc 2d 984 [App Term, 1st Dept 1989]). The issue is whether the mere placement by the Department of Housing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 512 East 11th Street HDFC v. GrimmetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Department of BuildingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- 157 West 123rd St. Tenants Assn. v. HicksonNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Department of Housing Preservation & Development of New York v. Mill River Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Eyedent v. Vickers ManagementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.