Legal Opinion
157 West 123rd St. Tenants Assn. v. Hickson
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1989PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered August 3, 1988 affirmed, with $10 costs.
Tenant resides in an in rem building operated by petitioner *985tenants association under the City of New York’s Tenant Interim Lease (TIL) program. The city is the owner of the building and supervises petitioner’s management during petitioner’s interim lease with the city. In this holdover proceeding, petitioner served a notice of termination specifying no reason for termination of the tenant’s month-to-month tenancy other than expiration of the term. Civil Court held that the notice was ineffective on due process grounds…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Fuller v. UrstadtNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hudsonview Terrace, Inc. v. MauryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
4Cited by13 opinions
- 512 East 11th Street HDFC v. GrimmetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Young v. Halle Housing Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Volunteers of America-Greater New York, Inc. v. AlmonteAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
- In Re MarcanoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- I.S.J. Management Corp. v. Delancy Clothing Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.