Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Guard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Dearborn Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

The questions presented by these records are identical. The pleas in the one case are but copies of the papers filed in the other, differing alone in the date of the occurrence, and the value of the animals killed. The rulings of the court were the same in both cases. A statement of the pleadings, the judgment and the facts in the one case will therefore be sufficient.

The appellee instituted a suit for the value of an animal killed by the locomotive of the appellant, where the railroad was not fenced. The defendant answered by one paragraph, to which a demurrer was sustained. Defendant then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. WhiteneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. TownsendIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. TiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wabash Railroad v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NewsomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API