Legal Opinion
Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 18, 2012No. 11-246PublishedCited by 354 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kagan
A provision of the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA), 25 U. S. C. § 465, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire property “for the purpose of providing land for Indians.” Ch. 576, § 5, 48 Stat. 985. The Secretary here acquired land in trust for an Indian tribe seeking to open a *212casino. Respondent David Patchak lives near that land and challenges the Secretary’s decision in a suit brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U. S. C. § 701 et seq. Patchak claims that the Secretary lacked authority under § 465 to take title to the land, and alleges economic, environmental,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by354 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Richard Beck v. Robert McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Reymundo Mendoza v. Thomas PerezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- KG Urban Enterprises, LLC v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.