Legal Opinion

Halquist v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 4, 1972PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER, Judge.

Represented by retained counsel throughout, the defendant is before this Court by his duly-perfected appeal in the nature of a writ of error contesting his conviction of unlawfully selling Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) and penitentiary sentence of not less than five nor more than six years.

We first consider his Assignment of Error challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant and sustain the verdict. In examining this contention, we are bound by the well-established rule, settled by numerous decisions of the Supreme Court of Tennessee and this Court, that a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Webster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
  3. Marshall M. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jamison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. DykesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. State v. DentonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. ZongeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API