Legal Opinion
Negron v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. & Optumrx, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 12, 2018No. 3:16cv1702 (WWE) consolidated with 16cv1904 (WWE)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Warren W. Eginton, Senior United States District Judge
In this putative class action, plaintiffs Kimberly Negron, Daniel Perry, Courtney Gallagher, Nina Curol and Roger Curol allege that defendants Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company ("CIGNA") and OptumRx, Inc., have violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"). Plaintiffs allege that defendants have artificially inflated prescription drug costs in violation of the terms of their health insurance policies.
*350In count one, plaintiffs assert their action…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Airquip, Inc. v. HomeAdvisor, IncDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Alaimo v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Malek v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Murphy Medical Associates, LLC v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.