Legal Opinion

Wooster v. Trimont Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 9, 1947No. 40235PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[1] Action to recover $7200 commission due plaintiffs for selling defendant's products in Missouri and elsewhere. Defendant[412] is a Massachusetts corporation and not licensed to do business in Missouri, but its president was served with process in St. Louis, under Sec. 880, R.S. 1939, Mo. R.S.A., Sec. 880. Defendant contended that the service was not sufficient to authorize the court to render a personal judgment against it and, limiting appearance, filed motion (in effect to quash service) to dismiss the cause. See Sec. 61, Laws 1943, p. 374, Mo. R.S.A., 847.61. The motion was sustained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Dye v. School District No. 32Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. International Harvester Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Caloric Appliance CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Bertha Jennings v. McCall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. K-Mart Corp. v. HolligerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Thomas v. Hudson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Ward v. Cook United, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API