Commonwealth v. Hook
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, Judge:
This is a direct appeal from Judgments of sentence totaling 8 1/2 to 15 years imprisonment imposed following appellant’s conviction by a jury on two counts of kidnapping 1 and one count of attempted rape. 2 Appellant’s primary argument on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his kidnapping convictions because the Commonwealth failed to prove that he “unlawfully confine[d] another for a substantial period in a place of isolation. ...” 18 Pa.C.S. § 2901(a). 3 Because we agree that the evidence is insufficient to establish that appellant confined his victims in a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- State v. La FranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RushingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.