Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hook

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1986No. 1126PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is a direct appeal from Judgments of sentence totaling 8 1/2 to 15 years imprisonment imposed following appellant’s conviction by a jury on two counts of kidnapping 1 and one count of attempted rape. 2 Appellant’s primary argument on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his kidnapping convictions because the Commonwealth failed to prove that he “unlawfully confine[d] another for a substantial period in a place of isolation. ...” 18 Pa.C.S. § 2901(a). 3 Because we agree that the evidence is insufficient to establish that appellant confined his victims in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. State v. La FranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. RushingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API