Legal Opinion

People v. Kepford

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1935No. Crim. 1440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEIRUP, J., pro tem.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the second degree upon evidence which may be summarized as follows:

Ralph Watson owned a poultry ranch. The defendant was the owner of a blue “Nash” sedan, around which was a narrow white stripe, and on three occasions the defendant had visited the ranch in his car. On the evening of February 10, 1935, Latima Ziemann, a neighbor, while driving slowly past the Watson place, observed a blue “Nash” sedan parked-at the side of the road. She noticed a streak of “a bright color”, which she recalled as being yellow, around…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LatonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. FrahmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. Wong HingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. People v. Van ZandtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Stanley v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. KittrelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API