Legal Opinion
Hastings Petroleum Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Hastings-on-Hudson
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtArthur D. Breuuah, J.
The plaintiff brings this action, pursuant to article 15 of the Real Property Law, for the purpose of determining that the defendant has no claim to certain real property which is in the record ownership of the plaintiff. The subject property is a strip of land approximately 33 feet in width and 402 feet in length.
The dispute is brought about by reason of the provisions of a certain unrecorded document, dated May 9, 1927, wherein one, Augusta S. Hastings, a former owner of all of the lands now owned by the plaintiff, together with other owners of adjacent properties, received certain benefits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Speir v. . Town of New UtrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- City of Santa Clara v. IvancovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Goldrich v. Franklin Gardens Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Nichols Copper Co. v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Nichols Copper Company v. ConnollyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hastings Petroleum Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Hastings-on-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961