Legal Opinion

Nichols Copper Co. v. Connolly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelby, J.:

The action is for an injunction restraining the city of New York and defendant Connolly, as president of the borough of Queens, their servants and agents, from trespassing upon lands claimed to be owned by the plaintiff, and from removing or interfering with buildings or other property on said premises.

The plaintiff is now, and has been for many years past, conducting the business of refining copper upon the said premises, using and operating a narrow gauge railway for interplant communication, and also operating railroad sidings and connections with the Long Island railroad, which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Speir v. . Town of New UtrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Reis v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Holdane v. . Trustees of the Village of Cold SpringNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. City of Cohoes v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. People v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. De Ruscio v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Devine v. Village of Port JeffersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  3. Petrie v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Givens v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  5. Lynbrook Homes, Inc. v. FreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API