People v. Dallas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), dated December 14, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In establishing the appropriate risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the burden of proving the necessary facts by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v Navarro, 115 AD3d 835,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. FarriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BalujaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. NavarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. DipilatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. StapletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. FonteboaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. MorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.