Kieth v. Paulk
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cedar Cvreuit Court. Action to recover for the use and occupation of real estate. Trial by jury. Yerdict for plaintiff and judgment thereon. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
i landlord fe^se®Upaymentof rent. The plaintiff proved that he in January, 1877, owned the real - estate to récover for the use and occupation this action was brought, that his title was record> and that defendant had occupied ^ prem¿ges for the cropping season of 1877, and the value of the use.
The defendant proved that he rented of Baldwin in January, 1877, who was then and for sometime previous thereto had been in possession. It was further shown that Baldwin had brought an action to set aside the plaintiff’s title, and that in December, 1877, a decree was rendered thereon by *261tlie District…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Baldwin v. WheelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Morse v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stanbrough v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Vogel v. ZuercherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Lockwood v. Carter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- Pierce v. RollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895