Legal Opinion

United States v. Borland

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 9, 1970No. Crim. A. No. 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, District Judge.

The Grand Jury returned an indictment on December 18, 1968 in which Arthur Wilson and St. Clair O. Parsons were charged with conspiring to violate 29 U.S.C. § 186(b) (1), 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 18 U.S.C. § 2314. The background facts out of which the indictment arose may be summarized as follows:

Defendant Wilson is the president and defendant Parsons the business delegate of Local Union 1694, International Longshoremen’s Association. Members of the local union are employed by Wilmington Stevedores, Inc. to unload vessels at the Wilmington Marine Terminal. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Maryland Nance, Jr., United States of America v. Virgil GinyardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Leonard Joseph Lamagna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. ManettiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API