Legal Opinion

Dyer v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1954No. Civ. 4848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Plaintiffs are engaged in the business of packing, warehousing and transporting household furniture and other goods in San Diego County. They employ six drivers and packers and their business affects interstate commerce. It is alleged in the complaint, which is for damages and injunctive relief, that on or about June 23, 1953, the defendants presented to plaintiffs a certain purported agreement with defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 542, and demanded that they sign the same; that the said contract contained the following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Shafer v. Registered Pharmacists Union Local 1172California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lisse v. Local Union No. 31California Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas Construction Co. v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers' Local Union No. 101Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. Kaw Paving Co. v. International Union of Operating EngineersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. California Kitchens, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Wamix, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Wamix, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API