Texas Construction Co. v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers' Local Union No. 101
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, C. J.:
The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter. Appellants contend it did not.
We summarize or quote portions of the record bearing upon the question presented as follows:
Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its home office in Dallas, Texas, and is duly authorized to do business in this state. Its business consists of the construction of dams and various other types of construction work throughout the United States. At the time the action was filed plaintiff was the general…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Building Trades Council v. Kinard Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Sterling v. Local 438, Liberty Ass'n of Steam & Power Pipe Fitters & Helpers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen & Helpers of America, Local Union No. 795Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Inland Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Local Union No. 541Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Kaw Paving Co. v. International Union of Operating EngineersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Hyde Park Dairies, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 795Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Reece Shirley & Ron's v. Retail Store Emp. U. & Loc 782Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.