Legal Opinion
Dennis A. Teague v. Brad D. Schimel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 2017No. 2014AP002360PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
DANIEL KELLY, J.
The Wisconsin Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a policy and practice of creating and disseminating criminal history reports in a manner that, at times, indicates that some individuals who are wholly innocent of any criminal activity have a criminal history. The DOJ is aware its policy and practice can have this effect. There is, however, no procedure by which an affected individual can stop the *462creation and dissemination of these reports. Petitioners say this occurs because the DOJ does not, before releasing the reports, balance the public's interest in disclosure against…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sauk County v. S. A. M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- City of Crandon v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
- Colborn v. Netflix IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Dennis A. Teague v. Brad D. SchimelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Love v. Medical College of WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020