Legal Opinion

Peggy Hill v. Barry Coggins

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 14, 2017No. 16-1457, 16-1477PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge Floyd wrote the opinion in which Judge Harris joined. Judge Bailey wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

FLOYD, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Barry Coggins and Collette Coggins, doing business as the Cherokee Bear Zoo (collectively, “the Zoo”), keep, care for, and exhibit bears. In 2013, Plaintiffs Peggy Hill and Amy Walker (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) visited the Zoo, and observed four of the Zoo’s bears living in what Plaintiffs believed to be an inhumane setting. In response, Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Amy Bryant v. Jim WoodallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. Precision Fabrics Grp., Inc. v. Tietex Int'l, Ltd.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
  3. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Red Wolf Coal. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018
  5. Precision Fabrics Grp., Inc. v. Tietex Int'l, Ltd.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API