Legal Opinion

Slayton v. Barry

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1900PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Tort, for deceit and for conversion. Trial in the Superior Court, before Blodgett, J., who directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant; and the plaintiff alleged exceptions. The material facts appear in the opinion, and in a note by the reporter.

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The declaration in this case is in two counts. The first count alleges in substance that the defendant intending to defraud the plaintiff, deceitfully and fraudulently represented to him that he was of full age and thereby induced the plain*514tiff to sell and deliver to him the goods described, and though often requested had refused to pay for or return the goods but had delivered them to persons unknown to the plaintiff. The second count is in tort for the conversion of the goods described in the first count. The case is here on exceptions to the refusal of the presiding judge to give certain…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Badger v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Kilgore v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Vasse v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  4. Rice v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ferguson v. BoboMississippi Supreme Court · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McGuire v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Sternlieb v. Normandie National Securities Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Brown v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Knudson v. General Motorcycle Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Dow v. LipsitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API