Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of County Commissioners v. City of Osborne

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1919No. 22,081Published

Appeal from Osborne district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1DissentJohnston, C. J.

(dissenting) : I am unable to concur in the conclusion reached in the foregoing opinion.

A county is a body corporate clothed with power to acquire and own property, and it has been'determined that a square on which the courthouse is built is subject to assessment for municipal improvements. (Comm’rs of Franklin Co. v. City of Ottawa, 49 Kan. 747, 31 Pac. 788.) A county, being the owner of property abutting on the street to be improved, is interested in the-project to the same extent as any other owner of property, and for the protection of the property there is the same necessity to petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Board of Commissioners v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Stevenson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Kimmerle v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Berry v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API