Board of County Commissioners v. City of Osborne
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Osborne district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.
1DissentJohnston, C. J.
(dissenting) : I am unable to concur in the conclusion reached in the foregoing opinion.
A county is a body corporate clothed with power to acquire and own property, and it has been'determined that a square on which the courthouse is built is subject to assessment for municipal improvements. (Comm’rs of Franklin Co. v. City of Ottawa, 49 Kan. 747, 31 Pac. 788.) A county, being the owner of property abutting on the street to be improved, is interested in the-project to the same extent as any other owner of property, and for the protection of the property there is the same necessity to petition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Board of Commissioners v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Stevenson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Kimmerle v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Berry v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.