United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Dissent by Judge CONLON.
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Rufino Ignacio Valdes-Vega (“Valdes-Vega”) appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress cocaine found in his truck. Valdes-Vega contends that the stop of his truck by Border Patrol Agents 70 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico Border violated the Fourth Amendment, and consequently, the cocaine found in his truck must be suppressed. We agree. The totality of the circumstances in this case did not provide Border Patrol Agents with reasonable suspicion to believe that Valdes-Vega was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. GordonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- State v. Phillip Walker-Brazie & Brandi-Lena ButterfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- Clarke v. City of North Las VegasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Curtis Wayne Robertson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019