Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Durham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1914No. 11734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered August 16, 1913, confirming an assessment roll, on appeal from the eminent domain commissioners.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment confirming an assessment roll, made by eminent domain commissioners to pay the damages awarded in a condemnation proceeding for regrading Ninth avenue and Ninth avenue north from its intersection with Westlake avenue near Denny Way, northward to its second intersection with Westlake avenue near *675Valley street. At the south end of this improvement, the regrade for which the condemnation was had makes a deep cut which diminishes to nothing at the Mercer street intersection, near the middle of the whole length of street involved. From there on to the north end,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Boyer AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In re Pine StreetWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In re Third, Fourth & Fifth AvenuesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Seattle v. Galbraith-Bacon & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Shilshole AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In re Local Improvement AssessmentsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. In Re Aurora AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. City of Spokane v. OnstineWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API