City of Seattle v. Galbraith-Bacon & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered March 20, 1913, modifying an assessment roll for street improvements, after a hearing on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
— Appeal by the city of Seattle from a judgment of the lower court modifying an assessment roll, as made up and filed by the board of eminent domain commissioners, so as to reduce all assessments appearing upon the roll ten per cent and charge that amount to the general fund. Cases of this character have been so often before this court in the past few years that it might well be said that the law is so well settled that there is nothing new to be said. The only thing we can do is to apply to the case before us the rules established by the previous cases. The latest assertion of the rule here…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Spokane v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Seattle v. Sylvester-Cowen Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Boyer AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Viegle v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- In re Leary AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Seattle v. DurhamWashington Supreme Court · 1914