Legal Opinion

In re the estate of Queen

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On motion for an allowance of counsel fee.

1Opinion of the Court

Back.es, Vice-Ordinary.

The appeal in this case was dismissed, with costs, against the appellant. The respondent now moves for a counsel fee, and relies upon section 196 of the Orphans Court act (Comp. Stat. p. 3884), which reads:

“In all litigated suits in the orphans court the court shall adjudge and direct which party shall pay the costs and expenses of such litigation, and shall have the power to apportion and determine the costs and expenses to be paid by either party.”

and cites in support of his motion the case of Bioren v. Nesler, 76 N. J. Eq. (6 Buch.) 576, and Kayhart v. Whitehead, 77…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re CarusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Nelson v. Industrial Insurance DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In Re MichelsohnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1944
  4. In Re BrodersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1933
  5. In Re McCabeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API