Legal Opinion

United States v. Bair

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 21, 1991No. 64,124; ACM 27605PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Senior Judge:

Pursuant to conditional pleas of guilty, see RCM 910(a)(2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, a military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted Technical Sergeant Bair of willfully disobeying a lawful order to submit a sample of his urine and of soliciting another to violate the same lawful order by providing appellant a sample that he could use in lieu of his own. See Arts. 90 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 890 and 934, respectively. Thereafter, the military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. RodriguezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API