Legal Opinion
United States v. Accardi
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 20, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge.
Motion by Peerless Insurance Company, pursuant to Rule 46(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for an order setting aside the forfeiture and remitting the penalty under such forfeiture of a bail bond filed in the above named action on August 18, 1955 and declared forfeited by order dated September 28, 1955, is denied.
The defendant, Accardi, was arraigned in the above entitled action on August 18, 1955. The indictment concerned certain narcotics violations in violation of Title 21, Sections 173 and 174, U.S.C. and Title 26, Sections 4704(a), 4701, 4703,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adrian Lawrence Dudley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. CienaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Larson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. John Wesley Egan and Bryan John Hill, and Stuyvesant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Horace FosterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Fook Dan ChinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. BradleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States v. RubioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981