Legal Opinion
United States v. George Perry Pollack
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1990No. 88-2749PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
George Perry Pollack (Pollack) appeals his conviction following a jury trial of possession with the intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
Prior to trial, Pollack moved to suppress the marijuana which was seized from the automobile he was driving and which was the basis of the indictment returned against him. At the suppression hearing, Border Patrol Agents Carroll and Sanchez testified on behalf of the United States. Stephen Stevers, an investigator, testified on behalf of Pollack, and Pollack testified on his own behalf.
Agent…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Heriberto Fernandez MonsisvaisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gary Ray Barbee and Juanita Elizabeth Barbee, Also Known as Juanita Elizabeth Lopez-AyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Roberto Lopez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. David Joe MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Heriberto Fernandez MonsisvaisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.