Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1938No. 5969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The parties agree that the writ of review in this case presents to this court for determination a single question. That question is: Was Benjamin Harrington, at the time he received the injury resulting in his death, engaged in an activity forming a part of a service in interstate commerce?

The Industrial Commission of the State of Utah concluded that deceased, at the time of the injury resulting in his death, was engaged in interstate commerce, and upon that finding, concluded and decided that the Industrial Commission of Utah was without jurisdiction to proceed with the cause…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Lehigh Valley Railroad v. BarlowSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Industrial Commission v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Wabash Ry. Co. v. BridalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Harrington v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API