Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Blackmun joins,
dissenting.
In final analysis, any question of statutory construction requires the judge to decide how the legislature intended its enactment to apply to the case at hand. The language of the statute is usually sufficient to answer that question, but “the reports are full of cases” in which the will of the legislature is not reflected in a literal reading of the words it has chosen.1 In my opinion this is such a case.
*578Qualifying language in 46 U. S. C. § 596 supports a much narrower construction than the Court adopts. For over 50 years after the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.