Legal Opinion

Clauser v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1885No. 11,965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The complaint filed by the appellant alleges that the parties are owners of adjoining lands; that, there is a natural watercourse through said lands, ending in Middle Fork creek; that the plaintiff and defendant, for' fifteen years past, have removed obstructions from, and have deepened and straightened the channel of said watercourse, and that the plaintiff has so continuously kept and maintained the same upon his land up to the present time; that he made valuable tile drains from all directions through his. land, and expended $1,000 therefor, of which defendant had full…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Judah v. Trustees of Vincennes UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Buchanan v. Logansport, Crawfordsville & Southwestern R. W. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Loeb v. WeisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Barkley v. MahonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hiatt v. Town of DarlingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Leary v. MoranIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Dean v. CrallMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Adams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API