Smith v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the court on the motion of defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears) to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Rodney R. Smith has responded in opposition to the motion, and the court, having considered the memoran-da of authorities, together with attachments, submitted by the parties, along with additional pertinent authorities, concludes that defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.
Rodney Smith brought this action…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Karen Jones v. Federated Financial Reserve Corporation Randy Lind Trw, Inc. Janice CaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Yohay v. City of Alexandria Employees Credit Union, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Wiggins v. District Cablevision, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Seedkem South, Inc. v. LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- Odier v. SumrallMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cole v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Strohbehn v. Access Grp. Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Jaycox v. GC SERVICES LTD. PARTNERSHIP-DELAWAREDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2006