Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Levanseler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from St. Joseph; Yaple, J. Bill by the National Bank of Sturgis against Frank E. Levanseler and Helen B. Levanseler to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage. Defendants filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, asking a rescission of the contract of purchase, or, in lieu thereof, a specific performance of the same by complainant. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Complainant, being the owner of a furniture manufactory in the village of Sturgis, negotiated a sale thereof to Frank E. Levanseler, one of the defendants. During the negotiation he professed to believe that the building did not stand wholly upon lots 6 and 7 of block 10, but extended 10 feet over and upon other lands adjoining, known in this record as the right of way of the Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad, and from the record we should perhaps find such to be the fact. An agreement was reached, and at a meeting of the complainant’s board of directors, at which Frank E. Levanseler was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sequist v. FabianoMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Van Valkenburgh v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sievers v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Pyramid Drilling Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API