Legal Opinion
Pyramid Drilling Co. v. Howell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 9, 1943No. 6038PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Justice.
On or about December 6, 1939, John R. Bunn borrowed $6,000 from appellee, Wm. 'S. Howell, Jr., giving as security therefor a chattel mortgage on his oil drilling rig No. 3, located in Yazoo County, Mississippi. 'The mortgage designated the property cov■ered by it as drilling rig No. 3 and in ■addition thereto described the component parts of said drilling rig. At the time the ■mortgage was given Bunn owned three ■other drilling rigs. As additional security Bunn assigned to Howell two “bottom-hole” letters, one from Hill & Hill and the otil-ar from W. L. Stewart, each in the sum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Anglin v. Cisco Mortgage Loan Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Mays v. First State Bank of KellerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Smith v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Walter Connally & Co. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kern Oil and Refining Co., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Tenneco Oil Co., Defendant/counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Noble Exploration, Inc. v. Nixon Drilling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Boyd v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1982
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1982