Legal Opinion
Southgate v. Linton
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt
The only question presented in this record is the sufficiency of the plea in abatement. The complainant Southgate is an architect and brought suit against Sam E. Linton, Sr., and others, a partnership doing business as the Linton Pencil Company, to recover on a claim of $2400 for an architect’s fee for services rendered the partnership. The situs of the partnership is in Marshall County. The bill named as defendants Sam E. Linton, Sr., a resident of Davidson County, and Sam E. Linton, Jr., Sam P. Rutledge, N. E. Reiney and A. B. Cranston, residents of Marshall County, and the bill stated that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chambers v. Sanford and TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weaver v. MarcusCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. PeltzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Doggrell v. Great Southern Box Co., Inc., of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Bancboston Mortgage Corp. v. Ledford (In Re Sikes)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995
- Johnson v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.