Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Company v. Hale

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1967No. 457PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

In response to the issues submitted, the jury found: (1) Harold A. Roberts was the agent of plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company and acting within the scope of his authority when he collected from Mrs. Smith the balance of $75 due on the policy involved in this cause; and (2) the policy was not cancelled prior to August 30, 1965 when the insured vehicle was involved in the accident in which the defendant Linda Mills Hále was injured.

The plaintiff stressfully contends that Harold A. Roberts at all times was acting independently as a producer of record in obtaining the insurance policy and was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Wheeler v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Graham v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Daniels v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Pearson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Ferguson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Arkwright-Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. Calvert Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API