Legal Opinion

Moss v. American International Adjustment Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1997No. 19232PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

Defendant-Appellant American International Adjustment Co., Inc. (AIAC) appeals from the order denying its motion for the appointment of an arbitrator to decide a no-fault dispute between AIAC and Plaintiff-Appellee, Kathleen N. Moss. Because (1) Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 431:10C-213 (1993) does not provide independent authority to compel arbitration in the absence of a mandatory agreement to do so, (2) the parties had not agreed to compulsory arbitration, and (3) Moss chose circuit court as her forum, we affirm the order of the circuit court. 1

I. BACKGROUND

On September…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Pflueger Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gillan v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jou v. Dai-Tokyo Royal State Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Balogh v. BaloghHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Abrams v. Cades, Schutte, Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API