Legal Opinion
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia v. Gettleman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 22, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brogan, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action to recover on four promissory notes, amounting to about $9,500. These were the facts: The defendants were answerable on the notes, on two of them as endorsers and on the remaining two as makers. All were payable at the Atlantic City National Bank, which had discounted the paper. The due date of two of the notes was January 30th, 1933, the due date of the others February 20th, 1933, and February 28th, 1933, respectively. The Atlantic City National Bank,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cheney v. LibbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Smith v. . KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Early v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cottrill v. First Huntington National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Federal Reserve Bank v. AlgarDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1937
- Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia v. AlgarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938