Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Mackris

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 8, 1959No. 56, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

Plaintiff Parsons brought suit in the court below to recover for personal injuries sustained by him while changing a tire on defendant’s motor vehicle. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant on the ground that plaintiff’s testimony showed that he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff appeals, and contends that the question of contributory negligence was one for the jury.

The facts are these:

Plaintiff Parsons is an automobile mechanic. On January 31, 1957, he was under contract with the American Automobile Association to answer calls…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perry v. D. J. & T. Sullivan, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Heldenfels v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Leo J. Ambort & Sons v. BrattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Young v. SaroukosSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
  4. Carroll v. Getty Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  5. Garofoli v. Salesianum School, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API