State v. Loomer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. App.R. 26(B)(1) clearly provides that a “defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” (Emphasis added.) Since the judgment that Loomer complains about was an appeal from a motion to dismiss, and not an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence, no basis existed under App.R. 26(B) to reopen the appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and'STRATTON, JJ., concur.
2Cited by21 opinions
- State v. LoomerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. AlfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. CongressOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Perry, 90497 (5-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. WaverOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.