Legal Opinion

State v. Loomer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1996No. 96-710PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. App.R. 26(B)(1) clearly provides that a “defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” (Emphasis added.) Since the judgment that Loomer complains about was an appeal from a motion to dismiss, and not an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence, no basis existed under App.R. 26(B) to reopen the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and'STRATTON, JJ., concur.

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. LoomerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. AlfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. CongressOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. Perry, 90497 (5-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. WaverOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API