State v. Williams
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJon E Wilcox, J.
¶ 60. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I agree with the court's holdings in sections I and II. However, I disagree with the majority's conclusion that the State materially and substantially breached the plea agreement in this case. The majority's decision on that issue gives insufficient consideration to the long-standing policy of making all relevant information available to a sentencing judge, *527and it will substantially hamper the State's ability to negotiate plea agreements in the future. For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.
¶ 61. As the majority notes, the prosecutor in a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Elias v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Farrar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.