Parvataneni v. ETrade Financial Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge.
Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, compel individual arbitration and stay proceedings filed by Defendant E*Trade Financial Corporation (“E*Trade”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and concludes that the matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for October 4, 2013 is HEREBY VACATED. For the reasons set forth in the remainder of this Order, Defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zenelaj v. Handybook Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Ortiz v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Universal Protection Service v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Universal Protection Services v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2015